The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur restored S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1382/2016 to its original number and granted the petitioner a two-week deadline to file requisite notices for respondent No. 6.
Restoration of the appeal to its original number; two weeks to file notices for respondent No. 6.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
[CRES-43/2021]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration No. 43/2021
Ganpat Ram @ Gunesh Ram S/o Sawai Ram, Aged About 27 Years, Baytu Panji, Tehsil And Dis. Barmer
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Siddharth Karwasara. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prashant Panwar for Mr. Rajesh Panwar. Ms. Mamta Vyas for Mr. Jagdish Vyas.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Order
10/08/2021
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
For the reasons indicated in the application seeking restoration of the appeal, the same is allowed. S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1382/2016 is restored to its original number.
The appeal was dismissed for non-fling of the requisite notices for respondent No.6, the same may now be filed within a period of two weeks.
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
74-Rmathur/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal dismissed for non-filing of notices should be restored.
Ganpat Ram @ Gunesh Ram
Imarti Devi
Ramesh
Ganpat
Hiro Devi
H.d.f.c. Agro General Insurance Co. Ltd
Arun Bhansali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
