The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur dismissed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal as barred under Section 104(2) CPC, directing the appellant to initiate appropriate proceedings under law.
Appeal dismissed as barred under Section 104(2) CPC; directed to approach appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 590/2021
Tarachand Kilaniya S/o Bhagirathram, Aged About 52 Years, Khaturiya Colony, Bikaner
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. |
Kunal Kalla. |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Order
06/08/2021
As the present Misc. Appeal is barred under the provisions of Section 104(2) CPC, the same is dismissed, leaving it open for the appellant to take appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
10-pradeep/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil miscellaneous appeal is maintainable when barred under Section 104(2) CPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tarachand Kilaniya
Basanti Devi
Banwari Lal
Arun Bhansali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
