Single-line dismissal of a civil revision petition on the ground that the underlying suit has been decided, rendering the appeal infructuous. No substantive legal reasoning provided beyond the submission accepted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 247/2011
----Petitioner
Versus
Vaid Shri Shyam Sunder Joshi S/o Shri Ram Ratan Ji Joshi R/o Deedwana since deceased represented by his legal representative:1/1 Praveen Kumar S/o Sh. Shyam Sunder Joshi 1/2 Pankaj Kumar S/o Sh. Shyam Sunder Joshi. 1/3 Saroj D/o Sh. Shyam Sunder Joshi
1/4 Urmila D/o Sh. Shyam Sunder Joshi.
All resident of Deedwana at present near Kaliji ka Chowk, Teh. Ladnu, District Nagaur.
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Samdariya. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Order
12/01/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on account of subsequent developments, whereby the suit, from which the present revision petition arose, itself has been decided, therefore, the revision petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of the submissions made, the revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
147-pradeep/-
Jain Vishva Bharti (Registered Society) and others
Vaid Shri Shyam Sunder Joshi (deceased) represented by Praveen Kumar and others
Arun Bhansali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
