Rajasthan High Court disposed of an SBI CMA benefit dispute by accepting a compromise between appellants and respondents, wherein the insurance company agreed to pay Rs.1,70,000/- extra compensation to the claimants.
Further enhancement of compensation amount to the tune of Rs.1,70,000/- to be paid by the respondent insurance company.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 6151/2017
----Appellants
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Satyapal Poshwal through Audio Call For Respondent(s) : Mr. Virendra Agrawal through video conferencing
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA Order
08/07/2021
Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the parties have settled their dispute by way of compromise. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of both the parties have requested
(2 of 2)
[CMA-6151/2017]
this court to pass an appropriate order for disposal of the appeal in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties.
Contents of the compromise, reads as under:-
COMPROMISE
“The parties to this litigation i.e. Appellants-claimants and respondent-Regional Manager, SBI General Insurance Company Limited have entered into compromise on the following terms:-
In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties,
the appeal stands disposed of.
(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J
Satyendra/46
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the SBI CMA benefit will be availed under the present dispute of enhancement of compensation.
Smt. Vidya Devi
Kumari Sandhya
Sachin
Kumari Anu
Smt. Shrawani Devi
Rohtash
Chandra Kumar Songara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
