Dismissed
Babulal v. Banwari Lal Yadav and Anr.
Rajasthan HCCMA/4214/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN a BENCH AT JAIQUR…
What the court decided
AI extract
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN a BENCH AT JAIQUR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN a BENCH AT JAIQUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 421412017
I. Babulal S/o Shri Hanuman Sahay, aged about 36 years, R/o Village Kharkata, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar I (Raj.).
,
----Claimant-Appellant
Versus
I. Banwari Lal Yad
is taken on record.
The contents of the compromise read as under:-
'The humble claimant-appellant and respondent No.2 have entered into the compromise on the terms mentioned as under: -
I That the parties have entered into compromise and the claimant has given his free consent to compromise the matter for further enhancement of the compensation
[CMA-354/2018]
(2 of 2)
amount to the tune of Rs.2,00,000/- (which includes interest part as welb) meaning thereby the insurance company would make the payment of Rs.2,00,000/- in addition to the amount already awarded by the learned Commissioner.
'I
compromise arrived at between the parties. Misc.
Ashish Kurnar /c2.
I. Babulal S/o Shri Hanuman Sahay
I. Banwari Lal Yad
JUS UMAR SONGARA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court