Learned counsel appearing for the appellant-company submits that the learned Tribunal has assessed the income of the injured at Rs.4,030/- per month, which is on higher-side, but no cogent evidence was produced to prove the said income of the injured. Counsel further submits that initially Permanent Disability Certificate of 2% of injured was produced on record before the learned Tribunal but after four-years, the claimant submitted Permanent Disability Certificate of 45%, which ought not to have been considered by the learned Tribunal while awarding the award amount. Counsel also submits that the vehicle was insured for the agricultural purpose but was being used for commercial purpose at the time of accident, which is in breach of policy condition and the learned Tribunal erred in holding the appellantcompany liable to pay the compensation. Lastly, counsel submits that learned Tribunal has awarded an excessive amount without having any factual foundation, thus, the impugned judgment and award deserves to be quashed and set aside and the amount awarded may be reduced.
