This order disposes of a Civil Contempt Petition. The High Court found that the respondents submitted a reply detailing steps taken to remove encroachment, leaving no case for contempt to survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 160/2020
Jai Singh S/o Shri Ram Sahai, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Village Digo, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.K. Paliwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Mehta, AAG with Ms. Archana and Mr. Amru Bishnoi
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AKIL KURESHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
10/12/2021
The respondents have filed reply stating the steps taken in furtherance of the representation of the petitioner for removal of the encroachment. No case for contempt survives.
The contempt petition is disposed of.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
(AKIL KURESHI),CJ
ANIL GOYAL / BM GANDHI-20
Jai Singh S/o Shri Ram Sahai
Shri Devendra Bhushan Gupta
Shri Peeyhus Samariya
Shri Jagdish Prasad Gurjar
Seema Gunawat
State Of Rajasthan
Akil Kureshi
Umasanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
