Arpit Kumar Jain v. the State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition dismissed because petitioner's counsel withdrew the plea citing changed circumstances without explanation.
Contempt petition dismissed because petitioner's counsel withdrew the plea citing changed circumstances without explanation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 1082/2019
Arpit Kumar Jain S/o Shri Dhul Chand Jain, Aged About 34 Years, R/o VPO Arthuna, Tehsil Garhi, Arthuna, District Banswara, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Choudhary for Mr. Kuldep Mathur
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
24/07/2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present
contempt petition in wake of changed circumstances.
The contempt petition is dismissed accordingly.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
11-Ramesh/-
Arpit Kumar Jain
The State Of Rajasthan
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court