In three connected writ petitions filed by senior citizens against RSRTC, the High Court noted that the matters were covered by a prior judgment. The Court observed that RSRTC must consider the petitions for post-retiral benefits and directed immediate processing in the turn prescribed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9554/2020
Shambhu Prasad Sharma (Senior Citizen) S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Sharma, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Jonawas, Chhipa Ke Mandir Ke Pass, District Bhilwara, (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9609/2020
Narendra Singh Choudhary S/o Sh. Onkar Singh, Aged About 61 Years, R/o C-22, Near Manglam Hospital, Rajapark, Adarsh Nagar, Sindhi Colony, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9615/2020
Jogendra Singh S/o Sh. Beero Singh, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Gram Post Baroli Chouth, Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
(2 of 2)
[CW-9554/2020]
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Ghiya, Mr. L.M. Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Ms. Devyani Rathore
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA Order
20/11/2020
Issue notice.
Ms. Devyani Rathore, Advocate, appears for the respondent - RSRTC and accepts notice on behalf of them.
No need to file reply as the controversy has already been considered and decided by this court.
Both the counsel agree that the matter stands covered by the earlier judgment passed by this court in the case of Bhori Lal Meena Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation in SBCWP No.11474/2019 decided on 26.07.2019.
Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of in the following terms:-
“ This Court disposes of the present writ petition with an observation that RSRTC will take up the case of the petitioner for considering to grant him post retiral benefits as per date of retirement and as per scheme framed by this Court.
This Court deems it proper to direct the RSRTCCorporation that due payment to the petitioner, will immediately be made as and when his turn comes for considering grant of such benefits. Accordingly, these writ petitions stand disposed of.”
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
Pcg/51 to 53
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to post-retiral benefits under the scheme framed by this Court?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bhori Lal Meena Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport CorporationDistinguished¶33
Bhori Lal Meena Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, SBCWP No.11474/2019
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shambhu Prasad Sharma
Narendra Singh Choudhary
Jogendra Singh
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation
Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation
Financial Adviser And Chief Pension And Gratuity Officer
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
