Disposed

Naresh Kumar Saxena S/O Shri Om Prakash Saxena v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Rajasthan HC20 Nov 2020CW/1594/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of the writ petition relying on an earlier judgment, directing the Respondent Corporation to consider the petitioner's case for post-retiral benefits and make payment immediately when his turn comes.

What did the court decide?

Direction to consider the petitioner's case for post-retiral benefits and make payment immediately when his turn comes.

Naresh Kumar Saxena S/O Shri Om Prakash… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1594/2020

¶3

Naresh Kumar Saxena S/o Shri Om Prakash Saxena, Aged About 62 Years, By Caste Kayasth, R/o House No. 2-K-28, Jawahar Nagar, Kota.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Chairman Cum Managing Director, Chomu House, Pariwahan Marg, Jaipur.

¶7

The Executive Officer (Administration), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Pariwahan Marg, Jaipur.

¶8

Deputy General Manager (Budget), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Pariwahan Marg, Jaipur.

¶9

Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Kota Depot Kota.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Jindal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Devyani Rathore

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

Order

20/11/2020

Issue notice.

Ms. Devyani Rathore, Advocate, appears for the respondent - RSRTC and accepts notice on behalf of them.

¶17

No need to file reply as the controversy has already been considered and decided by this court.

¶18

Both the counsel agree that the matter stands covered by the earlier judgment passed by this court in the case of Bhori Lal

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CW-1594/2020]

¶21

Meena Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation in SBCWP No.11474/2019 decided on 26.07.2019.

¶22

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in aforesaid following terms:-

¶23

“ This Court disposes of the present writ petition with an observation that RSRTC will take up the case of the petitioner for considering to grant him post retiral benefits as per date of retirement and as per scheme framed by this Court.

¶24

This Court deems it proper to direct the RSRTCCorporation that due payment to the petitioner, will immediately be made as and when his turn comes for considering grant of such benefits.

¶25

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of.”

¶26

(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J

¶27

Pocg/155

Naresh Kumar Saxena S/O Shri Om Prakash Saxena v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh Kumar Saxena S/O Shri Om Prakash Saxena v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Motilal S/O Radha Kishan Vs State of Rajasthan

Poonam D/O Shri Hawa Singh W/O Shri Hemraj Gurjar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Rajana Varma W/O Rahul Khatnawaliya D/O Radhe Shyam Raigar Vs Satate of Rajasthan

Gajanand Suwalka S/O Shri Bhanwar Lal Vs Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Chandra Shekhar Sharma Vs U O I and Ors.

Narendra Singh Choudhary S/O Sh. Onkar Singh Vs Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation