Disposed

Malti Jangid v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Sept 2020CW/8525/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking transfer of a government teacher to her husband's post. Relying on State Government policy and existing pending representation, the Court directed authorities to consider it sympathetically and dispose of it via speaking order within three weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directions to consider pending representation for transfer to husband's post based on State policy; stay application disposed.

Malti Jangid Vs the State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

(1 of 2)

¶2

[CW-8525/2020]

¶3

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶4

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8525/2020

¶5

Malti Jangid W/o Shri Umakant Jangid, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village Sadak Se Uper Ki Basti, Mandavari Phagi District Jaipur (Raj.) At Present Posted Govt. Senior Secondary School Dadiya, Block Arain, Dist Ajmer (Raj.).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶9

Director, Secondary Education, Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Bikaner.

¶10

Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Education Department, Ajmer Division, Dist Ajmer.

¶11

District Education Officer, Ajmer.

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pappu Sangwa

¶14

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶15

Order

¶16

09/09/2020

¶17

In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

¶18

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to post her at a place, where her husband, who is in Government service, is posted.

¶19

Various submissions have been made in the writ petition including the submissions that it is the policy of the State Government to post the husband and wife at the same station and that at the place where the petitioner seeks transfer, there are vacant positions. In view of the submissions, which have been

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

[CW-8525/2020]

¶22

made in the petition and the fact that the petitioner’s representation is already pending with the respondents, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to sympathetically consider the representation made by the petitioner based on the policy of the State Government.

¶23

The petitioner would be free to file a fresh representation along with a copy of the present writ petition. If such a fresh representation is made, the same may be considered and decided by the respondents objectively by a speaking order within a period of three weeks from the date such representation along with certified copy of this order along with writ petition is placed before the respondents.

¶24

The stay application also stands disposed of.

¶25

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J

¶26

153-Zeeshan/-

Malti Jangid v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Malti Jangid v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamlesh Kumar Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Satveer Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahendra Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Archana Garg Vs State of Rajasthan

Geetika Vs Sandeep Singh

Manju Kumari Vs State of Rajasthan