Remanded

Manju Kumari v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Sept 2020CW/8436/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition by directing respondents to sympathetically consider the petitioner's pending representation for posting at her husband's station, citing State policy and reserved vacancies.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to sympathetically consider petitioner's pending representation for transfer based on State policy and decide within three weeks via a speaking order.

Manju Kumari Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

(1 of 2)

¶2

[CW-8436/2020]

¶3

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶4

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8436/2020

¶5

Manju Kumari W/o Satyaveer Singh, Aged About 37 Years, Chunniya Ki Patti, Village Shekhawas, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar, Presently Working As Teacher Grade 3Rd, Level-1St Govt. Primary School, Devthari, Panchayat Samiti Mandal, District Bhilwara (Raj.)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶9

The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner (Raj.)

¶10

The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bhilwara (Raj.) 4. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Bhilwara (Raj.)

¶11

The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Mandal, District Bhilwara. (Raj.)

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pappu Sangwa

¶14

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶15

Order

¶16

09/09/2020

¶17

In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

¶18

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to post her at a place, where her husband, who is in Government service, is posted.

¶19

Various submissions have been made in the writ petition including the submissions that it is the policy of the State

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

[CW-8436/2020]

¶22

Government to post the husband and wife at the same station and that at the place where the petitioner seeks transfer, there are vacant positions. In view of the submissions, which have been made in the petition and the fact that the petitioner’s representation is already pending with the respondents, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to sympathetically consider the representation made by the petitioner based on the policy of the State Government.

¶23

The petitioner would be free to file a fresh representation along with a copy of the present writ petition. If such a fresh representation is made, the same may be considered and decided by the respondents objectively by a speaking order within a period of three weeks from the date such representation along with certified copy of this order along with writ petition is placed before the respondents.

¶24

The stay application also stands disposed of.

¶25

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J

¶26

129-Zeeshan/-

Manju Kumari v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manju Kumari v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamlesh Kumar Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Satveer Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahendra Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Malti Jangid Vs the State of Rajasthan

Archana Garg Vs State of Rajasthan

Geetika Vs Sandeep Singh