This order notes that costs were deposited before the deadline, making a court hearing unnecessary. The matter was directed to the Registrar for listing per a prior order and was disposed of without passing a further order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 209/2020
Aasin Mohammed
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahaveer Bhanwaria for Mr. Rajesh Punia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishabh Tayal Mr. Talat Bari Mr. Salman Agha for Mr. Anil Gaur, AAG
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
07/07/2020
Since, the petitioner has deposited a cost of Rs.10,000/- on 27.02.2020 (before 28.02.2020), the matter was not required to be placed before the Court. It was rather, required to be listed before the Registrar (Judicial) according to para No.10 of the order dated 18.02.2020.
Be that as it may. No further order is required to be passed in the matter. The file be consigned to Record.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
76-Ramesh/-
Aasin Mohammed
State Of Rajasthan
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
