This single-judge Bench dismissed a writ petition seeking reservation, holding that a petitioner relying solely on a SC certificate in her husband's name without proof of migration or a father's certificate could not claim reservation.
Writ petition and stay petition dismissed; no reservation benefit granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1420/2020
Santosh Rani D/o Shri Banwari W/o Som Prakash, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 2 VPO- Santpura, TehsilSangaria, District - Hanumangarh (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.L. Deora For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta for Mr. K.S. Rajpurohit, AAG
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Judgment
07/07/2020
(2 of 2)
[CW-1420/2020]
Urmila Kumari Vs. The State of Raj. & Anr. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.240/2020).
(DINESH MEHTA),J
14-Ramesh/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a petitioner with a SC certificate issued in her husband's name can claim reservation in Rajasthan without a father's certificate.
Whether a Scheduled Caste candidate who migrated to the State of Rajasthan can claim reservation in that state.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Urmila Kumari Vs. The State of Raj. & Anr. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.240/2020)Referred¶16
Ranjana Kumari Vs. State of Uttarakhand; 2018 (14) SCALE 755Applied¶4
State of Raj. Vs. Chitra Devi (D.B. Special Appeal (Writs) No.1960/2018)Applied¶4
Sushila Kumari Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.824/2020)Applied¶4
Santosh Rani D/o Shri Banwari
State Of Rajasthan
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
