Disposed

Mukesh Kumar Sharma v. State of Raj.

Rajasthan HC22 Jul 2020CW/1559/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought directions to join a post and claim benefits under a coordinate Bench decision in Babuy Lal Meena. Court directed petitioner to file a representation with facts and certified copy, for authorities to decide within eight weeks. Stay application disposed. Order thin.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to file representation with facts and certified copy of Babuy Lal Meena order within four weeks. Competent authority to decide in eight weeks.

Mukesh Kumar Sharma Vs State of Raj. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1559/2020

¶3

Mukesh Kumar Sharma S/o Moti Lal Sharma, Aged About 41 Years, 97, Sec-9-A Shrinath Nagar, Hiranmagri, Udaipur Rajasthan.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Raj., Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶7

The Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶8

The District Programme Coordinator Cum District Collector, Udaipur.

¶9

The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Udaipur. 5. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Jhadol, Udaipur.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. KuldeepMathur
For Respondent(s)	:

¶12

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶13

Order

¶14

22/07/2020

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s case is squarely covered by a Coordinate Bench decision dated 01.09.2015, rendered by this Court in a bunch of writ petitions, led by SBCWP No.144/2015 (Babuy Lal Meena & Ors. Vs. State & Ors.), whereby this Court has issued following directions:-

¶16

“(i) such of the petitioners who did not apply for extension of time shall not be entitled to join the post:

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-1559/2020]

¶19

(ii) the petitioners shall not be entitled to claim seniority over and above the candidates who have already joined their posts pursuant to their selection. Their names shall be placed at the boom of the select list;

¶20

(iii) the petitioners shall be entitled to notional benefits from the date of the appointment order till the date of their joining. They shall join their respective posts within a period of two months from the date of this order, failing which their appointment shall stand cancelled automatically.”

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present writ petition directing the petitioner to file a representation giving requisite facts and a copy of the judgment in the case of Babu Lal Meena (supra), within a period of four weeks from today along certified copy of the order instant.

¶22

The competent authority shall decide petitioner’s representation and do the needful in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks thereafter.

¶23

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶24

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶25

97-skm/-

Mukesh Kumar Sharma v. State of Raj.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Kumar Sharma v. State of Raj.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satyanarayan Swami Vs the State of Rajasthan

Kapil Jaiman Vs State of Rajasthan

Himanshu Khandelwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagjeet Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Kumar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Vijay Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan