The High Court of Rajasthan found the petitioner failed to send a representation or notice before filing a contempt petition. The case was dismissed without being entertained for this procedural default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 130/2020
Kapil Jaiman S/o Shri Shyama Kant Jaiman, Aged About 37 Years, By Caste Jaiman, R/o- Ramnagar Colony, Near New Bus Stand, Rajgarh, District- Alwar, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.R. Saharan
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
21/07/2020
Upon perusal of the record, this Court finds that the petitioner has not sent any representation/notice before filing the present contempt petition.
In view of the aforesaid, the present contempt petition is not
entertained.
(2 of 2) [WCP-130/2020]
The petitioner shall however be free to file fresh contempt petition, once the representation or notice is served upon the concerned respondents.
The contempt petition stands disposed of for statistical
purposes.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
25-Ramesh/-
Kapil Jaiman
State Of Rajasthan
Om Prakash Kasera
Rajendra Kumar Sharma
Ravindra Sharma
Jetha Ram Verma
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
