Allowed

Smt. Jamna Devi W/O Shri Hemraj Jat v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Aug 2020CRLMP/15/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In CRLMP-15/2020, a Criminal Miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. sought police protection for senior citizen petitioners alleging torture and threats from respondent no. 7, the daughter-in-law, and family members.

What did the court decide?

Directing the Station House Officer concerned to treat the petition as a complaint on receipt of the electronic copy and take necessary preventive measures to ensure the safety and security of the pet

Smt. Jamna Devi W/O Shri Hemraj Jat… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 15/2020

¶3

Smt. Jamna Devi W/o Shri Hemraj Jat, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Gathalon Ki Dhani, Nangal Purohit, Jaipur, Raj.

¶4

Hemraj Jat S/o Kanaram Jat, R/o Gathalon Ki Dhani, Nangal Purohit, Jaipur, Raj.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP.

¶8

Director General Of Police, Jaipur, Raj.

¶9

Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur, Raj.

¶10

SHO Police Station Harmada, District Jaipur West, Raj.

¶11

SHO Police Station Khoh Nagoriyan, District Jaipur, Raj.

¶12

SHO Police Station Bandikui, District Dausa, Raj.

¶13

Sapna Choudhary W/o Shri Ramavtar, D/o Ram Swaroop Choudhary, R/o Village Panditpura Via Bandikui, District Dausa, At Present R/o Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur, Raj.

¶14

Ramwaroop Choudhary S/o Unknown, R/o Village Panditpura Via Bandikui, District Dausa, At Present R/o Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur, Raj.

¶15

Narmda W/o Ramswaroop Choudhary, R/o Village Panditpura Via Bandikui, District Dausa, At Present R/o Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur, Raj.

¶16

Mahendra S/o Ramswaroop Choudhary, R/o Village Panditpura Via Bandikui, District Dausa, At Present R/o Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur, Raj.

¶17

Sunil S/o Shri Ramswaroop Choudhary, R/o Village Panditpura Via Bandikui, District Dausa, At Present R/o Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur, Raj.

¶18

Smt. Kalpana W/o Shri Mahendra, R/o Village Panditpura Via Bandikui, District Dausa, At Present R/o Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur, Raj.

¶19

Kajodi S/o Unknown, R/o Village Panditpura Via Bandikui, District Dausa, At Present R/o Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur, Raj.

¶20

Suman W/o Kajodi, R/o Village Panditpura Via Bandikui,

¶21

(2 of 3)

¶22

[CRLMP-15/2020]

¶23

District Dausa, At Present R/o Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur, Raj.

¶24

Pappu Jat S/o Unknown, R/o Village Panditpura Via Bandikui, District Dausa, At Present R/o Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur, Raj.

¶25

Urmila W/o Pappu Jat, R/o Village Panditpura Via Bandikui, District Dausa, At Present R/o Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur, Raj.

¶26

Dinesh Gurjar S/o Unknow, R/o Panditpura Via Bandikui, District Dausa, Raj.

¶27

Jagdish Sharma S/o Unknown, R/o Ratanpura Ghathwadi, Shapura, District Jaipur.

¶28

----Respondents

¶29

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. F.R. Meena, PP

¶30

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR SHARMA

¶31

Order

¶32

14/08/2020

¶33

This Petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with the prayer to provide police protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners.

¶34

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are senior citizens. The respondent No. 7-Sapna Choudhary, daughter-in-law of the petitioners and her family members are regularly torturing and threatening the petitioners. Being their life and liberty in danger, police protection may be granted to them.

¶35

Learned Public Prosecutor submits that appropriate directions may be passed in the matter.

¶36

Article 21 of the Constitution of India guarantees fundamental right to every person for protection of his life and

¶37

(3 of 3)

¶38

[CRLMP-15/2020]

¶39

personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the genuineness or correctness of the allegations made by the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with the direction that learned counsel for the petitioners shall send a copy of the petition along with its annexures to the Station House Officer of concerned Police Station through e-mail, and on receipt of the same, the Station House Officer concerned shall treat this petition as complaint and he shall take necessary preventive measures and other steps to ensure safety and security of the petitioners, in accordance with law.

¶40

However, as a precautionary note, it is made clear that this order shall not come in the way of investigation of the Criminal case, if any, and such case would take its own course as per law.

¶41

(SATISH KUMAR SHARMA),J

¶42

Hemant/160

Smt. Jamna Devi W/O Shri Hemraj Jat v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Jamna Devi W/O Shri Hemraj Jat v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kavita D/O Shri Mahaveer Prasad, W/O Shri Yogesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Kajod Mal S/O Mangla Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Sher Singh @ Shera S/O Balbir Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ranveer Singh S/O Shri Nafe Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramavtar Sharma S/O Shri Kalyan Dutt Sharma B/C Brahmin Vs State of Rajasthan

Mangelal S/O Harphool B/C Mali Vs Suresh Kumar Saini S/O Shri Ramniwas Saini