Single-judge High Court bench dismissed a bail application under Section 438 CrPC against the State. The court found that the charge of theft under Section 456 IPC had been proved based on investigation material.
Bail application dismissed, no anticipatory bail granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9889/2020
Bablu S/o Ramgopal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Mali Mohalla Ps Sarthal Dist. Baran Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K N Sharma (through Video Conferencing) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
16/10/2020
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-9889/2020]
(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J
PRIYANKA /29
2 issues framed by the court
Whether grounds are made out to grant anticipatory bail in an offence under Section 456 of IPC.
Whether the petitioner's claim of false implication is sufficient to allow bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bablu
State Of Rajasthan
Manoj Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
