Bench dismissed bail application under Section 439 CrPC. Court held that considering gravity of charges and criminal antecedents, no ground for bail was made out despite claim of false implication.
Regular bail application dismissed; petitioner remains in judicial custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7954/2020
Mohd. Raheesh S/o Shri Sumer, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Nai Thana Bichhore Dist. Mewat Haryana (At Present Confined In J.c In Sub Jail Kishan Garh Bas)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Goyal (through VC) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandra Gupta Chopra, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
14/10/2020
video conferencing and perused the record.
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-7954/2020]
(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J
Sunita Kanwar /4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in view of his criminal antecedents and pending multiple criminal cases.
Whether the gravity of charges under Sections 395 and 397 IPC precludes the grant of bail.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd. Raheesh
State Of Rajasthan
Manoj Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
