Mohan Lal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in apprehension of arrest in an FIR for offences under IPC Sections 420 and 120-B and the Rajasthan Public Examination Act.
What did the court decide?
Grant of anticipatory bail on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 830/2020
Mohan Lal S/o Teja Ram, Aged About 50 Years, By Caste Vishnoi, R/o Aalpura, Police Station Gudamalani, District Barmer (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through P.p.
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Vishnoi. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
06/02/2020
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R. No.188/2015, Police Station- Kankroli District Rajsamand for the offences under Sections 420 and 120-B of IPC and section 3/6 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Provocation of illegal equipment) Act.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for anticipatory bail in the apprehended FIR.
Whether the petitioner has committed any overt acts in the alleged offence.
Whether bail bonds and conditions for release should be prescribed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mohan Lal
- respondent
State
Coram
Vinit Kumar Mathur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/830/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court