Allowed

Vijay Pal v. State

Rajasthan HC5 Feb 2020CRLMB/1598/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court accepted the petitioner's prayer for release. The court granted bail allowing the accused to be released forthwith after furnishing the required personal bond and sureties to the satisfaction of the trial court.

What did the court decide?

The accused-petitioner was released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.

Vijay Pal Vs State — Rajasthan HC (2020) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR.

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1598/2020

¶3

Vijay Pal S/o Shri Jhithara, Aged About 20 Years, By Caste Patel Bheel, R/o Chanawala, P.s. Kalinjara, District Banswara (Raj.). (Presently Lodged In District Jail Banswara).

----Petitioner

Versus

State, Through P.p.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Singh. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shrawan Kumar Bishnoi, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶10

Order

¶11

05/02/2020

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.424/2019, Police Station- Kalinjara District Banswara for the offences under Sections 450, 376 of IPC.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that charge sheet has already been filed in the matter. He further submits that in the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under section 164 Cr.PC, she has stated that three months prior to the present incident, the present petitioner had taken away the prosecutrix where she stayed with him for 15 days. No report of that incident was report. The prosecutrix is a major lady of 18

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-1598/2020]

¶16

years. The conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶17

The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail.

¶18

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

¶19

Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Vijay Pal S/o Shri Jhithara arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.424/2019, Police Station- Kalinjara District Banswara shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees : Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶21

36-Anil Singh/-

Vijay Pal v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Pal v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahipal Vs State

Chetan Vs State of Rajasthan

Manphool Singh Vs State

Rebika Rai Vs State

Raja Ram Vs State

Shravan Kumar Vs State