Allowed

Arun Kumar Sharma@Vishnu Kumar S/O Govind Prasad Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Sept 2020CRLMB/8109/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with an FIR for offences under Sections 354, 354-A, and 354-B IPC, directing release upon furnishing a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Allowance of anticipatory bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Arun Kumar Sharma@Vishnu Kumar S/O Govind Prasad Sharma… — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8109/2020

¶3

Arun Kumar Sharma@vishnu Kumar S/o Govind Prasad Sharma, R/o Sapotara, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Pandey For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Ola, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶10

Order

¶11

02/09/2020

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.213/2020 registered at Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli for the offence(s) under Sections 354, 354-A, 354-B of IPC.

¶13

Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is business rivalry between the parties because the shop of petitioner and complainant are in front of one another.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶16

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Sapotara, District

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-8109/2020]

¶19

Karauli in F.I.R. No.213/2020 is directed that in the event of arrest

¶20

of the petitioner Arun Kumar Sharma@vishnu Kumar S/o Govind Prasad Sharma , he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶21

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶22

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶23

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶24

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶25

Jatin /27

Arun Kumar Sharma@Vishnu Kumar S/O Govind Prasad Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arun Kumar Sharma@Vishnu Kumar S/O Govind Prasad Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Govind Sahai Sharma S/O Shri Ram Niwas Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Avdhesh Singh Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Anop S/O Hatte Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rumali Devi W/O Sukhdev Meena B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravindra S/O Ramkaran Vs State of Rajasthan

Praturam S/O Lekhuram Vs State of Rajasthan