Allowed

Sheru S/O Shri Chahat B/C Mev v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC24 Feb 2020CRLMB/72/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble Court allowed the petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. directed the arresting officer to release the petitioner on bail upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner directed to be released on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Sheru S/O Shri Chahat B/C Mev Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 72/2020

¶3

Sheru S/o Shri Chahat B/c Mev, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Taju Ka Baas Mirjapur Tehsil Kishangarhbas Dist. Alwar

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Mahla, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

¶10

Order

¶11

24/02/2020

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.520/2019 registered at Police Station Kishangarhbas, District Alwar (P.S. District Bhiwadi) for the offence(s) under Sections 5, 6 and 8 of Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act, 195.

¶13

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is owner of the vehicle in which the Bovine Animals were being transported by co-accused Anish and no other criminal case except the present one is pending against the petitioner.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-72/2020]

¶18

case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶19

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Kishangarhbas, District Alwar (P.S. District Bhiwadi) in F.I.R. No.520/2019 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Sheru S/o Shri Chahat , he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶20

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶21

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶22

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶23

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

¶24

Arun/252

Sheru S/O Shri Chahat B/C Mev v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sheru S/O Shri Chahat B/C Mev v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhupendra@Rinku S/O Dhaniram B/C Lodhi Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaisingh S/O Laxminarayan B/C Kumhar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashok Kumar S/O Ganga Ram B/C Balai Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramlakhan S/O Ajmer Singh B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashok Bansal S/O Vishambhar Dayal Bansal @ B.D. Bansal B/C Mahajan Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishvendra Singh S/O Shri Lakhan Singh B/C Jat Vs State of Rajasthan