Allowed

Bhupendra@Rinku S/O Dhaniram B/C Lodhi v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Feb 2020CRLMB/1591/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court allowed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. filed by two accused persons arrested for Arms Act offences. The court held it just and proper to release them on bail upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail by furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.

Bhupendra@Rinku S/O Dhaniram B/C Lodhi Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1591/2020

¶3

Bhupendra@rinku S/o Dhaniram B/c Lodhi, R/o Kherli Ps Maniya Dist. Dholpur (Presently In Sub Jail Bandikui)

¶4

Sanjay Kumar S/o Hanuman Singh Charan B/c Charan, R/ o Dhani Charan Post Kalia Ps Malsisar Distt. Jhunjhunu (Presently In Sub Jail Bandikui)

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Umesh Vyas.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	S.S. Ola,P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

¶11

Order

¶12

20/02/2020

¶13

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.26/2020 registered at Police Station Sikandara District Dausa for the offence(s) under Section 3/25 of Arms Act.

¶14

Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that the case is triable by Magistrate and recovery has already been effected and no other criminal case except the present one is pending against the petitioners.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-1591/2020]

¶19

case, this court deems it just and proper to release the petitioners on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners Bhupendra@rinku S/o Dhaniram & Sanjay Kumar S/o Hanuman Singh Charan shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

¶22

MG/113

Bhupendra@Rinku S/O Dhaniram B/C Lodhi v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhupendra@Rinku S/O Dhaniram B/C Lodhi v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Urmila@Bhuri W/O Manoj B/C Jaga Vs State of Rajasthan

Shaif Ali S/O Shri Harun B/C Mev Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajveer S/O Shri Ramkhiladi Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaisingh S/O Laxminarayan B/C Kumhar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashok Kumar S/O Ganga Ram B/C Balai Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajni Meena S/O Shri Ramphool Meena B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan