Allowed

Ditaram v. State

Rajasthan HC1 Jul 2020CRLMB/6761/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, an NIA detainee, invoking Sections 439 CrPC and relevant substantive laws. The court found the petitioner medically unfit and unsupported by the investigation agency. Bail was granted subject to specific sureties and reporting conditions.

What did the court decide?

Grant of bail subject to reporting to Magistrate and appearing whenever summoned or in interests of justice.

Ditaram Vs State — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6761/2020

¶3

Ditaram S/o Shri Munglaji, Aged About 21 Years, Vagdari, Pindwada, Tehsil Pindwada, District Sirohi, Rajasthan. (Petitioner Lodged In Central Jail, Sirohi).

----Petitioner

Versus

State, Through P.p.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Jh eghikyflagA For Respondent(s) : Jh vfuy tks”kh] yksd vfHk;kstdA

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA

¶10

Order

¶11

01/07/2020

¶12

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr iqfyl Fkkuk] fi.MokM+k ftyk fljksgh esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k% 496@2020 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 363] 366,] 120ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ,oa 16@17 iksDlks ,DV] 2012 esa tekur dk ykHk nsus ds fy;s ;g izkFkZuk i= is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶13

izkFkhZ ds fo}ku~ vf/koDrk }kjk fuosnu fd;k x;k fd izkFkhZ dks >wBk Qalk;k x;k gS izkFkhZ ds fo:) dksbZ vkjksi ugha gSA ihfM+rk ds iqfyl c;ku o /kkjk 164lhvkjihlh ds c;ku esa Hkh izkFkhZ dk uke Hkxkus esa lg;ksx nsus esa ugha gSA izkFkhZ U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk g S ] vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkosA

¶14

fo}ku~ yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k djrs gq;s fuosnu fd;k fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ij /kkjk 363] 366, Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk rFkk 16@17 iksDlks ,DV ds xaHkhj vkjksi gS] vr% tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkosA

¶15

i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶16

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-6761/2020]

¶17

izdj.k esa /kkjk 376 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk vjksi vfHk;qDr xksaxkjke ij gSA izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr ,oa vijk/k dh xEHkhjrk dk s /;ku esa j[krs gq,] xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶18

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ nhrkjke iq= eaqxykth] fo}ku~ fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mlsa cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj :i;s dk O;fDrxr cU/k&i= ,oa iPphl&iPphl :i;s gtkj dh nks izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mUgsa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶19

(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J

¶20

5-AK/-

Ditaram v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ditaram v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narayan Vs State of Rajasthan-State

Chiranji Lal Vs the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation through Managing Director

Ganga Singh Shaktawat Vs Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Ram Das Vs U.O.I.

Pandit Jogeshwar Bohra Vs Rajasthan Board of Muslim Waqf

Jeeta Vs State