Mukesh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Rajasthan, Jodhpur allowed three separate anticipatory bail applications filed by the petitioners apprehending arrest in connection with an FIR involving IPC offences.
What did the court decide?
Applications allowed; petitioners to be released upon furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000 each with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each complying with court conditions.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1362/2020
Parasram S/o Shri Radhakishan, Aged About 37 Years, By Caste Mali, R/o Mokalpur, Tehsil Merta, District Nagaur.
----Petitioner
Versus State, Through P.p. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 524/2020 Mukesh S/o Munna Ram, Aged About 25 Years, By Caste Meghwal, R/o Sodas, Police Station Gotan, District Nagaur. ----Petitioner Versus State, Through P.p. ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1120/2020 Susheel S/o Shri Beerbal, Aged About 22 Years, B/c Meghwal, R/o Village Hirankhuri, Tehsl Merta, District Nagaur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishal Sharma. Mr. Suresh Kumar Maru. Mr. Rohitash Kumar Rathore. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
07/02/2020
These applications for anticipatory bail have been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with F.I.R.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are in a fit case for the grant of anticipatory bail apprehending arrest under the said FIR.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Parasram
- petitioner
Mukesh
- petitioner
Susheel
- respondent
State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/524/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court