This court dismissed India and appealed the High Court directed them to set aside the trial court order and remanded to investigating with the accused in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 464/ 2020
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj
%% vkns'k %%
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 464/2020
----Accused-Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
%% mifLFkr %%
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
izkFkhZx.k ds vf/koDrk Jh fodze ;knoA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh ,l-,l- vksykA ifjoknh ds vf/koDrk Jh jkeizrki lSuhA
2
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 464/ 2020
vkns'k fnukad 08-02-2020
U;k;ky; }kjk %
izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g izkFkZuk i= i z Lrqr dj tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZ gSA
cgl lquh xbZA ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k dk rdZ jgk fd izdj.k esa izkFkhZx.k ij tks vkjksi yxk;s x;s gSa] mlds dze esa dksbZ VªkalfdzIV i=koyh ij ugha gS] ek= lquh&lqukbZ ckrksa ds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZx.k dks izdj.k eas tksM+k x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku jgk fd izkFkhZx.k ds fo:) izFken`"V;k miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr ds vuqlkj ,slk dksbZ vkjksi ugha curk gS] ftlls izkFkhZx.k dks fxjQ~rkj fd;k tk,A izkFkhZx.k orZeku esa U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gSaA vr% tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd o ;ksX; vf/koDrk ifjoknh us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;kA
leLr rdksZa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA cgl ds nkSjku ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd ,oa ;ksX; vf/koDrk ifjoknh }kjk dsl Mk;jh dk rhu ckj voyksdu djus ds i'pkr VªkalfdzIV ds ckcr iwNk x;k rks mUgksaus Li"V :i ls Lohdkj fd;k fd dsl Mk;jh ij lhMh vo'; miyC/k gS] ysfdu lhMh dk VªkalfdzIV dsl Mk;jh esa ugha gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa bl izdze ij vU; rF;ksa ds ckcr xq.kkoxq.k ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA
3
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 464/ 2020
ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k x.ks'k ,oa jkts'k mQZ fjNiky dh
vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ iqfyl Fkkuk] fojkV uxj] ftyk t;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 351@2019 ds ekeys esa ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj :i;s dk cU/k&i= ,oa iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;kWa izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A
¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr
Fkkokuh@&
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicants who are awaiting prosecution under Section 351 IPC charges.
Whether the decision below was sustainable in view of the applicants' institutional ownership of the case.
Whether 60% representation in the first case is material for consideration of bail application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ganesh S/o Shri Hanuman Sahai Yadav
Rajesh @ Richpal S/o Shri Madharam Mali
State Of Rajasthan
J. egsUnz ekgs'ojh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
