Allowed

Ameen S/O Surendra B/C Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Feb 2020CRLMB/128/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner pending consideration by the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan under Section 439 CrPC. Bail is subject to sureties mandated under Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, Article 50, Sections 50000 and 25000-25000. The court mandates an undertaking to maintain the character of the order and to move any other application only if not bound by this bail order.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted pending consideration by High Court, conditional on physical presence in custody and furnishing of sureties as specified.

Ameen S/O Surendra B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj vkns'k

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

128/2020

¶5

Ameen S/o Surendra B/c Meena, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Khonkhar Ps Kherli Dist. Alwar Raj. (At Present Confined In Dist. Jail Alwar)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

vkns'k fnukad 8-2-2020

¶11

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh

¶12

izkFkhZ ds vf/koDrk Jh fxjh'k [kaMsyoky yksd vfHk;kstd Jh ,l ,l vksyk

¶13

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk i= ij nksuksa i{kksa ds rdZ lqus x;sA

¶14

izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vU; vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk feydj VªsDVj ds gy dh pksjh dk vkjksi yxk;k x;k gS fdUrq mDr gy orZeku izkFkhZ ls cjken ugha gqvk gSA mudk dFku jgk fd izkFkhZ vfHk;qDr dks ,sls fdlh vU; ekeys esa U;k;ky; }kjk nks"kfl) ugha fd;k x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku jgk fd Hkfo"; esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr blh izd`fr dk vU; dksbZ vijk/k dkfjr ugha djsxkA vr% izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkus ,oa mls tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶15

¶16

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izkFkZuk i= dk ?kksj fojks/k

¶17

fd;kA

¶18

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZ ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶19

izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa rFkk ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr fd, x;s rdksZa rFkk vfHk;qDr@izkFkhZ dh vksj ls nh xbZ v.MjVsfdax dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij fdlh izdkj dk dksbZ er vfHkO;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶20

vr% izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr izkFkZuk i= fuEu 'krZ ds lkFk Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ vkehu fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kkuqlkj :i;s 50]000@& ¼v{kjs ipkl gtkj :i;s ek=½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o :i;s 25]000&25]000@& dh nks lqn`< ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is'kh ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk rks izkFkhZ dks iqfyl Fkkuk [ksjyh- ij iathc} izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 421@2019 esa] ;fn og vU; fdlh izdj.k esa okafNr u gks rks mls vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosaA

¶21

;gka ;g Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr Hkfo"; esa blh izd`fr dk vU; vijk/k dkfjr djrk gS rks vfHk;kstu i{k bl tekur vkns'k dks fujLr djokus ds dze esa fof/klEer dk;Zokgh djus ds fy, Lora= gSA

¶22

¼U;k0 egsUnz ekgs'ojh½

¶23

ts,liaokj@37

Ameen S/O Surendra B/C Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ameen S/O Surendra B/C Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hemant Gupta S/O Shri Vijay Gupta B/C Mahajan Vs State of Rajasthan

Sanjay Jat@Sanju S/O Shri Jhabarmal B/C Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Vinod Kumar S/O Shri Bharat Singh B/C Chauhan Rajput Vs State of Rajasthan

Rinku S/O Rameshwar B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Shahjad S/O Kamru B/C Mev Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganesh S/O Shri Hanuman Sahai Yadav B/C Ahir Vs State of Rajasthan