The Single Judge dismissed the application for anticipatory bail, holding that no case was made out for its grant under Section 438 Cr.P.C. without expressing an opinion on the merits of the allegations.
Bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3324/2020
Danish Afroj W/o Shri Jahid Khan, R/o Gulab Bari Anta Ps Anta Dist. Baran Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Liyakat Ali, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Fateh Ram Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
09/06/2020
not appearing in the courts.
Video Calling as well as learned Public Prosecutor, who is present in the court.
and submitted that the petitioner has misbehaved with the lady constable.
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-3324/2020]
case, no case is made out to grant anticipatory bail to the
petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
JYOTI /42
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is maintainable when no prima facie case is made out despite allegations of serious offences.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Danish Afroj
State Of Rajasthan
INDERJEET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
