Allowed

Khevraram S/O Shri Bhagwan Sahay Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Nov 2020CRLMB/1921/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court allowed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., granting bail provisions to the petitioner pending trial with a bond condition and strict not-to-tamper/abscond terms.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; release on bail if arrested upon furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.

Khevraram S/O Shri Bhagwan Sahay Meena Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1921/2020

¶3

Khevraram S/o Shri Bhagwan Sahay Meena, Resident Of Doli Wali Dhani, Village Jagdishpura, Police Station Kot Khawada, Jaipur (Raj.) Through Natural Guardian His Father Bhagwan Sahai Meena S/o Mahadev Meena.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP.

¶7

		----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Anil Kumar Upman conference)	(through video
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Riyasat Ali,PP.

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶9

Order

¶10

23/11/2020

¶11

The present anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.08/2020 registered at Police Station Kotkhawda, District Jaipur for the offence(s) under Sections 354, 354A of IPC.

¶12

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been wrongly implicated in this case and he had lodged the report against brother of prosecutrix, Kailash and Raju, in which chargesheet has been filed for offence under Sections 365, 342, 323/34 of IPC. After that as a counter blast, the prosecutrix lodged said report against the petitioner. Allegations against the petitioner are waived.

¶13

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the anticipatory bail application.

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-1921/2020]

¶16

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶17

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Kotkhawda, District Jaipur in FIR No.08/2020 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Khevraram S/o Shri Bhagwan Sahay Meena , he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶18

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶19

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶20

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶21

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶22

Seema/5

Khevraram S/O Shri Bhagwan Sahay Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khevraram S/O Shri Bhagwan Sahay Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Omprakash Agrawal S/O Late Shri Ramniwas Vs State of Rajasthan

Ghanshyam Agrawal S/O Omprakash Agrawal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sujaram S/O Chittarmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish Suman S/O Jodhraj B/C Mali Vs State of Rajasthan

Priyanka Devi W/O Jintendra Biarwa @ Jitu Vs State of Rajasthan

Sagarmal S/O Sheoji Ram Vs State of Rajasthan