Allowed

Shaif Ali S/O Shri Harun B/C Mev v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Feb 2020CRLMB/1418/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., releasing the petitioner from a complaint involving offences under various sections of IPC by making him furnish a personal bond and two sureties, without expressing an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Shaif Ali S/O Shri Harun B/C Mev Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1418/2020 Shaif Ali S/o Shri Harun B/c Mev, R/o Vill. Solepur Patti Kasba Sikri Ps Sikri Dist. Bharatpur Raj. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg Dist. Bharatpur Raj.)

¶3

----Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶6

----Respondent

¶7

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umashanker Pandey. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Mahla, P.P.

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

¶9

Order

¶10

19/02/2020

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 359/2019 registered at Police Station Sikri District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 392, 420 & 120B of IPC later on added under Sections 332, 353, 336 & 427 of IPC.

¶12

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that the allegation against the petitioner is of snatching Rs.8,000/- and documents from the complainant and no other criminal case except the present one is pending against the petitioner and the petitioner is behind the bars since 22.12.2019.

¶13

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶14

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-1418/2020]

¶17

case, this court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶18

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused - petitioner Shaif Ali S/o Shri Harun shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

¶20

MG/60

Shaif Ali S/O Shri Harun B/C Mev v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaif Ali S/O Shri Harun B/C Mev v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Malkeet Singh S/O Shri Ratan Singh B/C Raishikh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahfooj S/O Mahboob B/C Musalman Vs State of Rajasthan

Atul S/O Nafesingh B/C Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Urmila@Bhuri W/O Manoj B/C Jaga Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajveer S/O Shri Ramkhiladi Vs State of Rajasthan

Samay Singh S/O Dhanphool B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan