Allowed

Anil Sharma @ Kalu v. State

Rajasthan HC14 Dec 2020CRLMB/14498/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for accused arrested for an offence punishable under Section 379 IPC, directing release on personal bond with sureties subject to executive satisfaction.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted upon execution of personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to satisfaction of trial court for appearance.

Anil Sharma @ Kalu Vs State — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14498/2020

¶3

Anil Sharma @ Kalu S/o Mahesh Kumar, Aged About 29 Years, R/ o Kaparda, P.s. Bilara, Dist. Jodhpur. (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur).

----Petitioner

Versus

State, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Hari Singh Rajpurohit,on VC
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Vikram Sharma,PP

¶9

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶10

Order

¶11

14/12/2020

¶12

In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, lawyers have been advised to refrain from coming to the Courts.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

¶14

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 288/2020 of Police Station Udaimandir, District Jodhpur for the offences punishable under Section 379 of IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that conclusion of the proceedings is likely to take some time and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-14498/2020]

¶19

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Anil Sharma @ Kalu S/o Mahesh Kumar shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 288/2020 of Police Station Udaimandir, District Jodhpur provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶20

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

¶21

69-Jitender/Sphophalia/-

Anil Sharma @ Kalu v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Sharma @ Kalu v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramod Soni Vs State

Mod Singh @ Mahendra Singh Vs State

Azad Vs State of Rajasthan

Guman Singh Vs State

Kailash Vs State of Rajasthan

Bawa Singh @ Bab Singh @ Kaliya Vs State