Allowed

Imrati Devi W/O Gangaram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Nov 2020CRLMB/13313/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed an anticipatory bail application filed by two female petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court directed the arresting officer to release them on bail if arrested, subject to conditions including furnishing a bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; petitioners to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, subject to specific conditions.

Imrati Devi W/O Gangaram Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13313/2020

¶3

Imrati Devi W/o Gangaram Age-70 Years

¶4

Ramesh Devi W/o Ramoatar, Both are R/o Udaipur Police Station Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶11

Order

¶12

12/11/2020

¶13

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.177/2020 registered at Police Station Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.) for the offence(s) under Sections 143, 323, 341, 325 and 308 of IPC.

¶14

Counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are ladies. No overt-act is defined against them in the FIR.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the

¶17

petitioners and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶18

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.) in F.I.R. No.177/2020 is directed that in the event of arrest

¶19

[CRLMB-13313/2020]

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

of the petitioners- (1) Imrati Devi W/o Gangaram and (2) Ramesh Devi W/o Ramoatar , they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶22

(i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶23

(ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶24

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶25

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶26

Jatin /106

Imrati Devi W/O Gangaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Imrati Devi W/O Gangaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagina Begam W/O Ajiz Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Nirmala W/O Ramesh Chand Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Aakash S/O Shri Lalit Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhuvnesh Kumar Meena S/O Shri Rameshwar Prasad Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Puneet Solanki S/O Vijender Solanki Vs State of Rajasthan

Brijesh W/O Rajesh Vs State of Rajasthan