Allowed

Smt. Nirmala W/O Ramesh Chand Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC11 Nov 2020CRLMB/10935/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge of Rajasthan High Court allowed anticipatory bail application filed by two accused persons. The court imposed conditions including personal bond, appearance for interrogation, and restriction on leaving India without permission.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted anticipatory bail on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to standard bail conditions.

Smt. Nirmala W/O Ramesh Chand Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10935/2020

¶3

Smt. Nirmala W/o Ramesh Chand Yadav, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vill. Imtipura, P.S. Malakaheda, Distt. Alwar Raj.

¶4

Smt. Heera Devi W/o Kailash Yadav, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Vill. Imtipura, P.S. Malakaheda, Distt. Alwar Raj.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Anil Kumar Jain
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP
	Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gupta (through VC)

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶11

Order

¶12

11/11/2020

¶13

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.384/2020 registered at Police Station Malakheda District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 323, 341 and 326 of IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no specific allegation has been levelled against the petitioners in FIR. As per FIR, Ashok gave blow on the head of injured Dhara Singh with Rod and Krishan also gave blow on his ribs with Sariya . Ramesh gave blow on his hand with stick.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioners and taking into account the facts and circumstances of

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-10935/2020]

¶19

the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶20

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Malakheda District Alwar in F.I.R. No.384/2020 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners- (1) Smt. Nirmala W/o Ramesh Chand Yadav and (2) Smt. Heera Devi W/o Kailash Yadav , they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶21

(i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶22

(ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶23

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶24

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶25

Jatin /21

Smt. Nirmala W/O Ramesh Chand Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Nirmala W/O Ramesh Chand Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagdish Vs Union of India

Ummed @ Samay Singh S/O Bhurya Vs State of Rajasthan

Lakkhi S/O Shri Ramju Vs State of Rajasthan

Nagina Begam W/O Ajiz Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Aakash S/O Shri Lalit Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishnu @ Vishnu Kumar S/O Dhanpal Vs State of Rajasthan