Kishanlal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Rajasthan allowed a bail application filed by the accused for an offence punishable under Section 376 IPC. The court granted bail without expressing an opinion on the merits.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted to the petitioner on personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11236/2020
Kishanlal S/o Shri Heera Lal, Aged About 43 Years, Brahmanon Ki Badi Bhagel, Nandesama, Police Station Sayra, District Udaipur (Raj.). (Presently Lodged At Central Jail Udaipur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through P.p.
| ----Respondent | |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. JVS Deora |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
12/10/2020
In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, lawyers have been advised to refrain from coming to the Courts.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in view of the pendency of the trial.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kishanlal S/o Shri Heera Lal
- respondent
State, Through P.p.
Coram
DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/11236/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court