Allowed

Jeevan Ram v. State

Rajasthan HC8 Oct 2020CRLMB/10909/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court Order allowed a bail application filed by two accusedpersons under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for an offence under Section 387 IPC. The court granted bail without expressing an opinion on merits, requiring a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two surety bonds of Rs. 25,000 each.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two surety bonds of Rs. 25,000 each.

Jeevan Ram Vs State — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10909/2020

¶3

Jeevan Ram S/o Sh. Kesu Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Rawat Bera, Sirmandi, Police Station Osian, District Jodhpur. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur).

¶4

Om Prakash S/o Sh. Chaina Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Kerla Bera, Police Station Osian, District Jodhpur. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur).

----Petitioners

Versus

State, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Vineet R. Dave,through VC
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Laxman Solanki,P.P.,for the State

¶10

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KUMARI PRABHA SHARMA

¶11

Order

¶12

08/10/2020

¶13

This bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is laid by petitioners in connection with an FIR No.204/2020 of Police Station Osian, District Jodhpur, wherein they are charged for offence punishable under Section 387 IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that offence alleged against petitioners is triable by Magistrate. The accusedpetitioners are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioners.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-10909/2020]

¶18

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering totality of facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to grant indulgence to the petitioners by enlarging them on bail.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners, (1) Jeevan Ram S/o Sh. Kesu Ram, and (2) Om Prakash S/o Sh. Chaina Ram, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.204/2020 Police Station Osian, District Jodhpur, may be released on bail; provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

(KUMARI PRABHA SHARMA),J

¶21

28-Bharti/-

Jeevan Ram v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeevan Ram v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Vishnoi Vs State

Ganga Singh @ Vijay Singh Vs State

Manpreet Singh @ Mani Vs State

Kishanlal Vs State

Dinesh Vs State

Mahaveer Vs State of Rajasthan