Hapu Ram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed a miscellaneous application for extension of interim bail as infructuous because the original interim order required surrender before authorities by 31.07.2020, and the matter came up after that date.
What the court decided
(1 of 1)
[CRLMA-178/2020]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Appli No. 178/2020
Hapu Ram S/o Shri Gula Ram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Kharad P.s. Dhorimanna, Dist. Barmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : ---For Respondent(s) : Mr. Muktiyar Khan, PP
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
02/09/2020
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for extension of interim bail should be allowed when the interim order has already expired or become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Hapu Ram
- respondent
State
Coram
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMA/178/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court