The High Court rejected a bail cancellation application filed under Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C. It held that the bail was granted in a matrimonial dispute, no error existed in the order, and no grounds were made out for cancellation.
Criminal Misc. Bail Cancellation Application was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Cancellation Application No. 19/2020
Ramphool Choudhary D/o Ramlal Choudhary, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Jaikampura Dist. Jaipur Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Yuvraj Samant |
|---|---|
| Ms Neha Amola | |
| For State | : Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, PP |
| For Complainant(s) | : Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Order
05/11/2020
(2 of 2)
[CRLBC-19/2020]
appears to have taken place amongst the parties. The order does
not call for any interference and there appears no error in allowing
the bail application.
rejected.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
HEENA/01
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail cancellation application filed by the petitioner under Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C. deserves to be entertained given the jurisdiction of the High Court.
Whether any error exists in the lower court's order allowing bail which entitles the High Court to interfere.
Whether the petitioner has made out any specific ground to justify entertain the bail cancellation application in a matrimonial dispute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramphool Choudhary
State Of Rajasthan
Rahul Chopra
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
