The High Court dismissed the bail application of the petitioner, who was accused of cheating and extortion. The court rejected the contention regarding a co-accused's bail and did not grant relief based on the evidence presented.
Bail application dismissed; petitioner to remain in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8901/2020
Shanu Sepat D/o Sh. Rajendra Sepat W/o Sh. Harlal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Rampura Tan Nathawatpura Police Thana Sadar Sikar Dist. Sikar Raj. (At Present Confined In Dist. Jail Sikar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shivraj chauhan for Mr. Vijay Poonia For State : Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, PP I.O. Ms. Kanchan, S.I. P.S. (Udhyog Nagar Sikar)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
04/11/2020
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-8901/2020]
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
NIKHIL KR. YADAV /106
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused of cheating and extortion under IPC Section 384.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shanu Sepat
State Of Rajasthan
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
