Allowed

Ashik Ali v. Smt Sampati Devi and Ors.

Rajasthan HC16 Jan 2020CRES/198/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order concerns a petition challenging the stay of proceedings against the petitioner under Section 126 Gazette of the State of UP. The court interpreted the provisions regarding the period of limitation and the mandatory nature of procedures under Section 41 CrPC, and decided to uphold the stay on the grounds of procedural irregularity rather than substantive dispute.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; proceedings against the petitioner stayed pending correction of procedural defects.

Ashik Ali Vs Smt Sampati Devi and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj ,dyihB flfoy fofo/k jsLVksjs'ku izkFkZuk i= la[;k &198@2018 vUrxZr ,dyihB flfoy fuxjkuh ;kfpdk la[;k&201@2017

¶3

vkns'k fnukad%& 16-01-2020

¶4

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh izdk'k xqIrk

¶5

mifLFkr%& vf/koDrk okLrs ;kph %& Jh ds-ds-ekFkqj

¶6

;kph@izkFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g izkFkZuk i= vkns'k 41 fu;e 19 lh-ih-lh- flfoy fuxjkuh ;kfpdk la[;k&201@2017] tks fnukad 20-11-2017 dks ;kph dh vne gkftjh o vne iSjoh esa fujLr dj nh xbZ Fkh] dks iquLFkkZfir fd, tkus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA izkFkZuk i= 93 fnu ds foyEc ls izLrqr fd;k x;k gS ftlds laca/k esa /kkjk&5 fe;kn vf/kfu;e dk izkFkZuk i= i`Fkd ls izLrqr fd;k x;k gS A

¶7

;ksX; vf/koDrk ;kph@izkFkhZ us izkFkZuk i= /kkjk&5 fe;kn vf/kfu;e esa of.kZr rF;[email protected] dks gh cgl esa nksgjkrs gq, izkFkZuk i= jsLVksjs'ku izLrqr djus esa gq, foyEc dks {kek fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk dh A

¶8

lquk x;k o fopkj fd;k x;k A

¶9

/kkjk&5 fe;kn vf/kfu;e esa ;g of.kZr fd;k x;k fd fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fujLr gksus dh lwpuk ;kph@izkFkhZ dks fnukad 20-03-2018 dks gksus ds ckn ;kfpdk fnukad 22-03-2018 dks rhu ekg dh vof/k esa izLrqr dj nh xbZ gS A bl izdkj izkFkhZ@;kph dh vksj ls tkucw>dj izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djus esa dksbZ foyEc dkfjr ugha fd;k x;k gS cfYd foyEc xyrh ls dkfjr gqvk gS A Li"V gS fd izkFkhZ@;kph }kjk izkFkZuk i= esa ;g of.kZr ugha fd;k x;k gS fd izkFkhZ@;kph dks fnukad 20-03-2018 dks fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vne gkftjh vne iSjoh esa fujLr gksus dh lwpuk fdl izdkj izkIr gqbZA

¶10

¶11

izkFkZuk i= /kkjk&5 fe;kn vf/kfu;e esa izkFkZuk i= jsLVksjs'ku dks 93 fnu ds foyEc ls izLrqr fd, tkus ds laca/k esa fdlh izdkj dk dksbZ dkj.k nf'kZr ugha fd;k x;k gS A izkFkhZ dk dsoy ;g dguk i;kZIr ugha gS fd mls fnukad 20-03-2018 dks fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fujLr gksus dh tkudkjh gqbZ ftlds ckn izkFkZuk i= fnukad 22-03-2018 dks izLrqr dj fn;k x;k A bu rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa izkFkZuk i= jsLVksjs'ku izLrqr djus esa gq, 93 fnu ds foyEc dks {kek fd, tkus dk dksbZ i;kZIr] ;Fks"B o larks"ktud dkj.k nf'kZr ugha fd;s tkus ls izkFkZuk i= /kkjk&5 fe;kn vf/kfu;e fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gS A

¶12

mDr foospu ls izkFkZuk i= /kkjk&5 fe;kn vf/kfu;e fujLr fd;k tkrk gS o lkFk gh izkFkZuk i= jsLVksjs'ku Hkh vof/k ckf/kr gksus ls fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶13

¼U;k0 izdk'k xqIrk½

¶14

_f"kds'k lksuh@46

Ashik Ali v. Smt Sampati Devi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashik Ali v. Smt Sampati Devi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hardeva S/O Ramsukha Vs Radheshyam S/O Ramniwas

Ghuda Ram S/O Bhuraram Vs Sugan

Pankaj Kumawat S/O Shri Mangal Chand Kumawat B/C Kumawat Vs State of Rajasthan

Pitram S/O Shri Lachhuram Jaat Vs Riddh Karan S/O Kishan Lal Nai

Reena W/O Late Devendra Vs Nandkishore S/O Dhanna Lal

Jagmohan Prasad Agarwal @ Dr. J.M. Agarwal S/O Late Shri Jagdish Prasad Gupta Vs Surendra Singh S/O Late Shri Laxman Singh