Allowed correction of name in a stay order and quashed the stay order issued in the wrong name vide order dated 28-01-2020 which would otherwise remain.
The stay order dated 28-01-2020 was quashed after correcting the name of the party in the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj
,dyihB flfoy fofo/k izkFkZuk i= la[;k &18@2020 vUrxZr ,dyihB flfoy fuxjkuh ;kfpdk l[;ka &08@2020
vkns'k fnukad%& 11-02-2020
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh izdk'k xqIrk
mifLFkr%& vf/koDrk okLrs ;kph %& Jh e;ad xqIrk vf/koDrk okLrs v;kph %&
orZeku izkFkZuk i= }kjk vkns'k fnukad 28-01-2020 e s a Vad.k ds dkj.k gqbZ =qfV dks la'kksf/kr fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZ gSA
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@;kph dk dFku gS fd vkns'k fnukad 28-01-2020 esa okn 'kh"kZd esa v;kph dk uke vuUr 'kekZ ds LFkku ij vkuUn 'kekZ xyrh ls vafdr gks x;k gSA vr% mDr vkns'k esa gq;h mDr =qfV dks la'kksf/kr fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh A
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@;kph }kjk j[ks x, mDr dFkuksa ij fopkj djus o vkns'k fnukad 28-01-2020 dk voyksdu djus ds ckn vkns'k fnukad 28-01-2020 fuEu izdkj la'kksf/kr fd, tkus ;ksX; gS %&
mDr vkns'k ds okn 'kh"kZd esa tgka 'kCnkoyh vkuUn 'kekZ iz;qDr dh xbZ gS] ogka mlds LFkku ij 'kCnkoyh vuUr 'kekZ izfrLFkkfir fd, tkus ds vkns'k fn, tkrs gSa A
;g vkns'k] vkns'k fnukad 28-01-2020 dk Hkkx jgsxk A
izkFkZuk i= blh vuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gS A
¼U;k0 izdk'k xqIrk½
_f"kds'k lksuh@77
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the correction of the appellant's name in the lower court's order should result in the quashing of a stay order that was issued based on the erroneous name.
vf/koDrk okLrs ;kph
vuUr 'kekZ vf/koDrk okLrs v;kph
izdk'k xqIrk
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
