A D.B. Special Appeal (contempt) where counsel for petitioners did not press the petition but sought liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings. The petition was dismissed with liberty granted.
Contempt petition dismissed with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1601/2019
In
D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.536/2013
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Saugath Roy For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order
10/02/2020
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners does not want to press the contempt petition, however seeks liberty to take appropriate proceedings in respect of the grievance raised.
(2 of 2)
[CCP-1601/2019]
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty as prayed for.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
(SANGEET LODHA),J
Sudha/55
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition be pressed or disposed of.
RAJEEV SAXENA AND ORS.
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.
SANGEET LODHA
MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
