This court dismissed a review petition challenging appointments made under an original merit list. The bench held that since no person with lesser marks than the applicants in the revised list had been appointed, the grievance lacked merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Writ Review No. 226/2018
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr.D.S.Sodha on behalf of |
|---|---|
| Mr.Kuldeep Mathur | |
| For Respondent(s) | : ------- |
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
02/01/2019
Civil Misc. Application No.675/2018:-
(2 of 3)
[WRW-226/2018]
Civil Misc. Application No.3752/2018:-
Writ Review Petition No. 226/2018:-
(3 of 3)
[WRW-226/2018]
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J (PRADEEP NANDRAJOG),CJ
1-Kshama Dixit/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the review application should be allowed in view of the placement of candidates in the revised merit list.
Whether appointments made pursuant to an original merit list should be reserved when a revised list is prepared with higher marks for applicants.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Pooja Sharma vs. RPSC and Ors.Referred¶31
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3541/2014 Pooja Sharma vs. RPSC and Ors.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mukesh Sharma
Baboo Lal Choudhary
Mukesh Kumar Pareek
Gaurev Kumar Jat
Suresh Kumar Saini
Parsi Joshi
Pradeep Nandrajog
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
