The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed an application to implead respondents in a pending writ petition on the grounds that the decision in the principal writ petition had already resolved the issue of impleadment and the application remained procedurally defective.
Application for impleadment dismissed as no question arose and defects remained unremoved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Writ Misc Application No. 328/2018
Subhash Singh & Anr.
----Petitioners
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : --------
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
02/01/2019
(2 of 2)
[WMAP-328/2018]
does not arise. Further, the application continues to be defective and objection raised by the Registry have not been removed.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for impleadment needs to be heard when it remains defective.
Balvinder Singh
Dharmpal
State of Rajasthan
Pradeep Nandrajog
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
