High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the writ petition for contempt alleging violation of the order dated 03.11.2017 regarding recruitment of Pharmacists. The court held that retaining lower-ranked candidates is not contempt without proof that posts are unfilled via RTI.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Writ Contempt No. 1276/2018
Ramkaran S/o Shri Nemichand, Aged About 37 Years, Plot No. 12, Bankiya Bera, Magra Punjala, Jodhpur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Vikas Bijarnia on behalf of Mr.Nishant Motsara
For Respondent(s) : --------
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
08/01/2019
(2 of 2)
[WCP-1276/2018]
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J (PRADEEP NANDRAJOG),CJ
8-Kshama Dixit/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether retention of candidates with lower marks than the petitioner for pharmacist posts constitutes contempt of the order dated 03.11.2017.
Whether the general averment that notified posts remain vacant amounts to contempt without filing a Right to Information Act application.
Ramkaran S/o Shri Nemichand
Vinu Gupta
The Dr. V.k. Mathur
The Mr. Rakesh Sharma
State Of Rajasthan
Praadeep Nandrajog
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
