The High Court of Rajasthan allowed an appeal quashing a transfer order that moved a low-paid contract employee 90 km away. The court noted the transfer lacked shown exigency of service and would adversely affect the appellant's finances.
Quashing of the government transfer order dated 20.08.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1524/2018
Chhagan Ram Mori S/o Shri Hansa Ram, Aged About 43 Years, By Caste Garasiya, Village- Peepalikhera, Tehsil Kotara, District Udaipur (Rajasthan)
----Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors.
| For Appellant(s) | : | Mr. Bharat Singh | ----Respondents |
|---|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : | None |
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
07/01/2019
[SAW-1524/2018]
(2 of 2)
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
(PRADEEP NANDRAJOG),CJ
19-Mohit Tak/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quashing of a government transfer order is justified when it causes adverse financial impact on a low-paid employee without showing great exigency of service.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chhagan Ram Mori
State of Rajasthan
Pradeep Nandrajog
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
