Allowed

Hanuman Sahay S/O Shri Laxminarayan B/C Sain v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Jul 2019SOSA/519/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an appeal, the High Court allowed a suspension of sentence application filed by the appellants, who are senior citizens on bail during trial. The court suspended the trial court's sentence pending the appeal and granted bail subject to a bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

What did the court decide?

Suspension of sentence awarded by trial court during pendency of appeal; release on bail upon furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Hanuman Sahay S/O Shri Laxminarayan B/C Sain Vs… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.519/2019

¶3

¶4

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 692/2019

¶5

Hanuman Sahay S/o Shri Laxminarayan B/c Sain, Aged About 64 Years, R/o House No E-6-A Shyam Nagar New Sanganer Road Thana Shyam Nagar Jaipur Raj. Appellants Are Confined In Central Jail Jaipur

¶6

Smt Shanti Devi W/o Shri Hanuman Sahay B/c Sain, Aged About 60 Years, R/o House No E-6-A Shyam Nagar New Sanganer Road Thana Shyam Nagar Jaipur Raj. Appellants Are Confined In Central Jail Jaipur

¶7

----Appellants

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Upman For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Mahla, PP

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

¶13

Order

¶14

01/07/2019

¶15

This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the appellants alongwith the appeal.

¶16

Counsel for the appellants has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that during the trial, the appellants were on bail. Counsel further submits that the appellants are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased and both are senior citizens. Counsel further submits that both the appellants are in custody and the hearing of the

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CR SOS 519/2019]

¶19

appeal may take long time, hence, the sentence awarded to the appellants may be suspended during the pendency of the appeal and they be released on bail.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application for suspension of sentence.

¶21

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and carefully scanned the entire material available on record, this suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the appellants- (1) Hanuman Sahay S/o Shri Laxminarayan (2) Smt Shanti Devi W/o Shri Hanuman Sahay by the trial court, shall remain suspended during the pendency of the appeal and they be released on bail, provided they furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before this Court on 02/08/2019 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

¶23

JYOTI /23

Hanuman Sahay S/O Shri Laxminarayan B/C Sain v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hanuman Sahay S/O Shri Laxminarayan B/C Sain v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashish Kumar Shrivastav S/O Anil Kumar B/C Kayasth Vs State of Rajasthan

Chunni Devi D/O Shri Raghunath Balai B/C Balai Vs State of Rajasthan

Ankur Dangi S/O Shri Hoshiyar Singh B/C Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Shahjad S/O Jannu Khan B/C Mev Vs State of Rajasthan

Guru Charan Singh Jatav Son of Shri Ramswaroop Jatav Vs the State of Rajasthan, through Its Principal Secretary

Harish Kumar S/O Kewaram B/C Mali Vs State of Rajasthan