In an application seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the single-judge bench dismissed the plea. Relying on the seriousness of the alleged offences, the court declined to grant relief without expressing an opinion on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6206/2019
Shahjad S/o Jannu Khan B/c Mev, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Titpuri, Police Station Kathumar, Distt. Alwar, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.B. Sharma. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
01/07/2019
Heard counsel for the parties.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this matter.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
In the facts and circumstances of the present case and looking to the seriousness of the offence(s) alleged against the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Hence, the bail application stands dismissed.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
MG/06
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. given the seriousness of the alleged offence without expressing an opinion on merits.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shahjad S/o Jannu Khan
State Of Rajasthan
INDERJEET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
