High Court at Jodhpur dismissed an appeal against an order directing payment of minimum regular pay scale. The court held that appellate intervention was not called for, noting the impugned order did not direct extension of pay scales.
The appeal was dismissed; no relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 535/2019
----Appellants
Versus
----Respondents
(2 of 3)
[SAW-535/2019]
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sunil Beniwal, AAG. Mr. Vikash Singh, AAAG. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhimanyu Singh.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
23/05/2019
The State appeals against the judgment of the learned Single Judge who directed payment of minimum of the regular pay scale to the respondent, who had approached the Court under Section 226 of the Constitution of India. In so doing, the impugned order relied upon the judgment in Parin Rawal vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [S.B. Civil Writ No.4954/2018].
(3 of 3)
[SAW-535/2019]
assigned by the employer to the concerned officer or employees in the same cadre or grade. This does not per se show or prove disparity in the nature of the work; rather manner in which the work is taken from employee is entirely in the control of the employer. Furthermore the Court notices that in Parin Raval (Supra) , and State of Punjab vs. Jagjeet Singh (2017) 1 SCC 148 was noticed and relied upon.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
(S. RAVINDRA BHAT),CJ
12-Ashutosh/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether appellate intervention is called for in S.B. Civil Writ No. 4954/2018.
Whether the nature of employment and job responsibilities of the posts of the parties were identical or closely similar.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Parin Rawal vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Relied on¶25
Parin Rawal vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [S.B. Civil Writ No.4954/2018]
State of Punjab vs. Jagjeet SinghRelied on¶30
State of Punjab vs. Jagjeet Singh (2017) 1 SCC 148 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State Of Rajasthan Through The Principal Secretary Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department
The Commissioner Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department Jaipur Rajasthan
The District Program Coordinator Cum District Collector Office Of Zila Parishad Jalore District Jalore Rajasthan
The Additional District Program Coordinator Cum Chief Executive Officer Office Of Zila Parishad Jalore District Jalore Rajasthan
The District Program Coordinator Cum District Collector Office Of Zila Parishad Pali District Pali Rajasthan
The Additional District Program Coordinator Cum Chief Executive Officer Office Of Zila Parishad Pali District Pali Rajasthan
S. Ravindra Bhat
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
