An appeal by the CEA against the excise department is dismissed because the appellant was granted permission to withdraw the appeal due to low tax effect under a specific Finance Ministry circular.
Application to withdraw the appeal is allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
D.B. Central/excise Appeal No. 41/2015
CCE, Udaipur
----Appellant
Versus
M/s Arihant Tiles And Marbles Pvt. Ltd.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : None For Respondent(s) : None
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. INDRAJIT MAHANTY HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
04/11/2019
In view of the Circular No. F.No.390/Misc./116/2017-JC dated 22.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs, the tax effect involved in the present being less than Rs.1 crore, learned counsel appearing for the appellant filed an application seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.
Application No.01/2019 is allowed.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J (INDRAJIT MAHANTY),CJ
8-MohitTak/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
CCE, Udaipur
M/s Arihant Tiles And Marbles Pvt. Ltd.
Indrajit Mahanty
Pushendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
